Skip to main content
Identifying the right use case for Devin is key to maximizing efficiency and return on investment (ROI). Below are best practices for selecting a use case that aligns with Devin’s strengths.

Best Enterprise Use Cases

Devin’s Ideal Requirements

If your task meets most or all of these requirements, it is an ideal candidate for Devin.

Crafting Devin’s Work

Selecting the right task type is crucial for maximizing Devin’s reliability.

Tall & Deep vs. Wide & Shallow

Narrow-deep vs Shallow-broad comparison
A large backlog of simple, horizontally-scalable tasks (e.g., resolving SonarQube issues) can generate significant ROI when scaled across thousands of iterations. Horizontal changes diagram
The simpler the slice, the more reliable the overall project.

What to Slice

Great candidates for Devin:
  • Migrations
  • Refactors
  • Modernizations
  • Technical debt backlogs
For instance, when working on a code migration, it must be broken down into isolated slices, each handled by an individual Devin session. Slicing use cases illustration

Verification

A slice should be the smallest atomic unit of the project.
Devin must have a clear success/failure verification mechanism.
Avoid tasks with excessive dependencies or external systems. Devin excels at coding tasks.
Backwards compatibility diagram

Parallel Execution

Parallel execution visualization

Scaling Considerations

Overall model diagram

Best Practices for Task Definition

Devin excels in ongoing technical debt tasks (e.g., PR reviews, QA automation) when they are properly sliced and structured.
Migrations, modernizations, and refactors are strong use cases if they can be tackled incrementally. For example, a full-repository migration requiring all changes at once is not recommended.
Case Study: Nubank Migration Case Study